ETHNIC
PARTICIPATION IN THE STATE SECTOR DURING THE PNC ERA
By Prem Misir Ph.D.
I want to continue the discussion on marginalization in this
Viewpoint. My previous study on marginalization was preliminary.
There, indeed, is more to come. However, today, I want to
examine the state of play on the issue of ethnic involvement
in various state sectors during the People’s National
Congress (PNC) era. Participation in a society has to be evaluated
on parameters governing the political economy, and in this
case, the political economy under former President Burnham.
The following is what Mr. Burnham had to say about national
unity in 1971. “When I described 1971 as the year of
national unity…I meant the active involvement of the
overwhelming number of Guyanese in our national goals and
aims.”
Guyana under Burnham experienced serious economic
failures. Let’s present a few as follows:
1. The 7-year Development Plan (1966-1972) buckled in 1969.
2.The ‘Feed, House and Clothe the Nation’ Development
Plan remained a catchword without producing substance.
3. The third Development Plan (1978-81) increased the debt
burden accompanied by little or no industrialization.
4. Hoyte claimed in 1981 that the economy ‘was disastrous’,
and the New Nation (the PNC’s mouthpiece) noted that
the economy was ‘tottering on the brink of collapse’.
5. Rigged elections continued to be the norm.
6.The militarization of Guyana was enhanced with about one
military personnel for every 35 citizens.
7. The women’s section of the PNC proposed a one-party
state for Guyana in 1971.
8. Norman Semple of the Guyana Public Service Association
talked about ‘a crisis of authority’ induced by
‘a blurring of the line of authority between political
and administrative decision making’, creating a problem
in’…the efficiency of the administrative machinery
of the state…’.
9. Decline in the East Indian student population at the University
of Guyana possibly correlated with the operations of the National
Service.
10. Perceptions that acquisition of significant jobs is related
to holding a PNC membership card abounded.
There are other characteristics that cannot be included here,
but which, indeed, will be part of a larger study on the falsity
in the claim of marginalization.
My interpretations and discussion on ethnic participation
are based on the findings of Debiprashad and Budhram’s
study of East Indians in the Caribbean, published in the 1980s.
These were two colleagues of mine at the University of Guyana.
Let’s see how East Indians and Africans fared under
the PNC when it came to active participation in the public
sector at July 1, 1979.
In agriculture, the data from six crops showed that more than
70% were East Indian operators. The crops were rice, sugar,
coconuts, green vegetables, citrus, and pineapples. East Indians,
according to the researchers, clearly contributed the most
positive role in agricultural transformation of the economy.
East Indians in their rural habitat provided an important
food basket for Guyana at a time when the slogan ‘feed,
clothe, and house’ the nation became a catch phrase.
Later, the phrase remained a mere slogan.
Table1: Public Service-Senior Administrative
and Executive Ranks
| |
Total
Nos. |
E.I |
N |
O |
E.I% |
N% |
O% |
|
Ministers |
29 |
7 |
20 |
2 |
24 |
69 |
7 |
|
Other
Senior Positions |
66 |
31 |
25 |
10 |
47 |
38 |
15 |
|
Permanent
Secretaries |
29 |
2 |
25 |
2 |
7 |
86 |
7 |
Principal
Assistant Secretaries |
38 |
14 |
21 |
3 |
37 |
55 |
8 |
|
Personnel |
22 |
5 |
17 |
- |
23 |
77 |
- |
|
Accounts |
19 |
9 |
8 |
2 |
47 |
42 |
11 |
|
Other
Departmental Heads |
139 |
19 |
102 |
18 |
14 |
73 |
13 |
Table 2: Ethnic Composition of
Heads of main Educational Institutions
|
Total
Nos. |
E.I |
N |
O |
E.I% |
N% |
O% |
|
Higher
Institutions of Learning |
9 |
- |
9 |
- |
- |
100 |
- |
|
Multilateral
Schools |
5 |
- |
4 |
1 |
- |
80 |
20 |
|
Community
High Schools |
25 |
5 |
19 |
1 |
20 |
76 |
4 |
|
Other
Secondary Schools |
40 |
23 |
15 |
2 |
57.5 |
37.5 |
5 |
Education
Officers |
20 |
6 |
14 |
- |
30 |
70 |
- |
Source: Debiprashad & Budhram’s East
Indians in the Caribbean (1987)
In the Ministries, only a handful of East
Indians occupied senior administrative positions. Africans
filled most of these posts, as evidenced in Table 1. In 1973,
there was only one Permanent Secretary compared to two in
1979. About 37% of Principal Assistant Secretaries and 23%
of Heads of Personnel Divisions were East Indians. There were
7 East Indian Ministers and 20 African Ministers.
Table 2 shows the racial and ethnic imbalance in education
during the PNC’s ruling years. Africans headed all higher
education institutions, as the University of Guyana, Cyril
Potter College of Education. No East Indian headed the Multilateral
Secondary Schools, while only five East Indians were Heads
of Community High Schools out of a total of 25.
A serious racial imbalance of Education Officers prevailed.
Out of a total of 20 Education Officers, 14 were Africans.
Africans dominated the Chairmanship and members of State Boards,
Committees, and Commissions. There were 35 Chairmen of African
origin of a total of 44 Boards/Committees/Commissions. Of
a total of 487 members of Boards/Committees/Commissions, only
97 were East Indians and 365 were Africans.
At the time of the study, there were 38 corporations and companies
under the jurisdiction of the Guyana State Corporation. Each
corporation had a Board of Directors and a General manager.
In a total of 270 Directors, 170 were Africans and 53 were
East Indians. General Managers numbered 24 Africans and 7
East Indians. Even among Deputy General Managers, Africans
dominated, carrying 18 out of 27 positions.
This racial and ethnic imbalance demonstrated in the 1970s,
achieved a high level of sustainability almost throughout
the PNC’s ruling years. This is part of the PNC’s
legacy of sustained ethnic imbalances in the public sector,
a legacy that corrodes the foundations of the social and economic
infrastructures of this country. When the Opposition elements
complain about the performance of the People’s Progressive
Party (PPP/C) Administration, let them know that many of these
infrastructures are being rebuilt.
The PPP/C Government, erroneously perceived as favoring East
Indians, has not created an East Indian public sector, in
the same way that the PNC regime concocted an African-dominated
public sector. Perhaps, we can say East Indians were marginalized
in the Public Sector during the PNC ruling years. In fact,
the PPP/C Administration has long begun the arduous task of
enabling all ethnic groups to actively participate in Guyana’s
national goals and aims. These hard data convincingly demonstrates
the PPP/C’s commitment to all ethnic groups. Prepare
for more hard data on marginalization.
TOP
|